Luke Sullivan on how to judge outdoor ads A far more realistic approach than poring

The advert appears for two seconds.

“What did you see?”

“A dog. Something about insurance. Blue logo.”

The intended message was retirement planning. The logo was green.

That result is more useful than twenty minutes of appreciative discussion around the full layout. Outdoor advertising exists among speed, distance, weather, traffic and other people’s demands. Remove those constraints and the review is judging a different object.

Two seconds cannot prove persuasion. It tests availability: did the basic claim and owner arrive quickly enough to compete? A strange image may earn another glance. A frequently passed poster can reveal itself over time. Placement changes everything. Still, copy that requires a chair and a cup of tea is making an optimistic bet on public generosity.

The second version has one image, six words and a visible name. It appears for two seconds.

“What did you see?”

“Retirement advice for dog owners.”

Closer. Unfortunately the product serves everyone.

The image had become so memorable it rewrote the market. Creative teams sometimes celebrate recognition while ignoring what was recognised.

Version three returns to the street at realistic size. This time viewers name the promise and company, though several find the tone severe. That disagreement belongs in the next decision. At least they are now disagreeing with the advert that will actually exist.

Behavioural principles

Behavioural ideas at play in this post

Short, plain-English explanations of the principles behind this post, with links to related books and examples in the archive.