Our want (and happiness) for what others want

Researchers put a stuffed female black grouse beside a male that real females had ignored. More females entered his territory. Whatever qualities he possessed remained exactly as before. The visible fact of being chosen had changed.

There is something wonderfully rude about the experiment. Preference likes to describe itself as private judgement, then a taxidermy prop walks in and improves the candidate.

Crowds can carry useful information. Six occupied restaurant tables suggest that six groups noticed something the passer-by has not. Popular software may connect more easily with colleagues. A widely watched programme supplies tomorrow’s conversation. Copying other people is often cheaper than investigating everything from first principles.

The trouble is that popularity hides its production history. A genuine queue and a hired queue look identical from the pavement. “Ten thousand customers” may represent ten thousand independent judgements, or a sequence in which later buyers saw the choices of earlier ones. Once the counter is public, the number helps create the next number.

Marketers naturally adore this because the signal can do work the product has not yet earned. Crop the empty tables from the photograph. Display the busiest hour. Call an early lead “most popular” and let social proof compound it. None of these necessarily requires a lie; selection does the dirty work more elegantly.

Back in the territory, the stuffed female contributes no judgement at all. The arriving birds supply the real preference. The first piece of evidence was cloth, stuffing and a very successful pose.

Behavioural principles

Behavioural ideas at play in this post

Short, plain-English explanations of the principles behind this post, with links to related books and examples in the archive.