Spoilers don't kill stories

The programme begins by immediately telling the audience who dies.

Act one: the lovers meet.

The ending is already known. The first hopeful exchange therefore carries information the characters do not possess.

Elsewhere, minute one shows the killing.

Minute four: the detective arrives and admires the suspect’s expensive watch.

Minute twelve: the suspect gives an alibi with too much polish.

Minute twenty: a glass appears in the wrong place.

Nobody watching is waiting to learn the murderer’s identity. Attention has moved to method, error, proof and the moment confidence cracks.

A child opens the same story for the ninth time. Every event is known. Interruption is forbidden.

At minute thirty-seven, the detective borrows a pencil.

Minute thirty-nine: he returns because there is one more thing.

Minute forty-two: the suspect corrects a detail nobody asked about.

Minute forty-eight: the glass is mentioned.

Minute fifty-one: the watch matters.

The plot summary could have stated all of this in four sentences. It would contain the facts and almost none of the experience.

The child turns back two pages because a favourite line is coming. The adult beside them begins reciting it too early and is immediately told to stop reading so far ahead.

Behavioural principles

Behavioural ideas at play in this post

Short, plain-English explanations of the principles behind this post, with links to related books and examples in the archive.