The BASIC model

Behavioural science has a magpie problem. It sees a shiny bias and flies off with it.

Checkout abandonment? Loss aversion. Late expenses? Present bias. Weak security? People need nudging. The diagnosis sounds clever enough to survive without meeting the behaviour.

BASIC is useful because it forces the cleverness to queue behind observation. What exactly happens? Where? For whom? Surprise fees, a broken field and ordinary distraction can all produce an abandoned basket. They require three different interventions and perhaps one developer with access to the error logs.

The final C is the bit glamorous projects misplace. Continuation means discovering whether the result survived month three. Ownership changes. Novelty fades. People route around the intervention. The headline measure improves while an unmeasured cost grows behind it.

That is less fun than putting coloured bias cards on a table. It is also the difference between inquiry and behavioural astrology.

Map the moment. Test competing explanations. Try several small responses. Watch benefits and side effects. Name whoever maintains the change after the experiment stops receiving attention.

An acronym proves nothing, naturally. This one at least reminds the enthusiast that the world gets the final decisive vote before, during and after the clever idea.

Behavioural principles

Behavioural ideas at play in this post

Short, plain-English explanations of the principles behind this post, with links to related books and examples in the archive.