The mismatch between employers and employees

Executives guessed 64%. Employees delivered 2%. That gap spans two different planets sharing one payroll.

Leaders confuse transmission with reception. They spent weeks making the strategy, saw it across twelve drafts and presented it beneath a giant screen. To everyone else it was an hour between customer problems, followed by 200 messages and the usual incentives. Of course it feels memorable upstairs. Repetition becomes boring to the sender long before it becomes usable to the receiver. Yet chanting the slogan harder will not rescue seven “top priorities”, because seven priorities are merely a buffet from which every team can select permission for its existing plan. Communication is proven by retrieval and changed behaviour, not the delivery receipt on an all-staff email. If everyone can interpret the words differently, alignment is imaginary.

Ask people to name the priorities without hints, then describe a recent trade-off those priorities changed. If answers scatter, cancel the motivational roadshow. Shorten the list. Keep the language stable. Show which project stopped, which customer request won and which behaviour got rewarded. People believe resource decisions long after they forget the launch video. A priority earns its name only by winning when two worthwhile options cannot both survive.

Behavioural principles

Behavioural ideas at play in this post

Short, plain-English explanations of the principles behind this post, with links to related books and examples in the archive.