The mistake of thinking advertising has become harder

Advertising was much easier in the past. Nobody had competitors, clients loved brave work, every viewer watched attentively, and media was purchased with sixpence and a firm handshake. Unfortunately, the past is unavailable for comment.

Yes, today’s system is messy. More formats, platforms, dashboards and specialists can turn one campaign into an international conference about aspect ratios. But the same tools also let a tiny company shoot decent work cheaply, test demand quickly and reach buyers without first owning a television network. Difficulty arrived with leverage in its suitcase.

Every advantage decays. Search looked beautifully efficient, so competitors entered and bids rose. Organic social offered reach, so feeds filled and platforms rationed it. Television offered scale, so the challenge became affording it and being remembered among everyone else who had also discovered television. The “easy era” was usually a short window enjoyed by people moving before the rest.

Nostalgia confuses unfamiliar work with impossible work. It also gives mediocre marketers a flattering excuse: the campaign did not fail because the promise was weak or the work forgettable; modernity itself sabotaged the results.

The durable jobs remain annoyingly old-fashioned. Understand the buyer. Choose something worth saying. Reach enough people. Make it memorable. New technology rearranges those problems and occasionally opens a side door. Then everyone notices the door.

The past was not easier. Its difficulties have simply stopped sending us emails.

Behavioural principles

Behavioural ideas at play in this post

Short, plain-English explanations of the principles behind this post, with links to related books and examples in the archive.