The subjects given the most frequent feedback earned less. Every update was accurate. The damage came from experiencing short-term losses often enough to keep disturbing a long-term decision.

This is the bit dashboard culture hates. Information has a dosage. A figure can be true, relevant and available, then become harmful because it is delivered at the rhythm of the noise rather than the decision.

Investment prices move all day. Campaign conversions wobble by the hour. Body weight shifts with salt, water and timing. A screen turns each wobble into an event with a timestamp and a colour. Doing nothing begins to look negligent, so people interfere with plans that have not had time to work.

Fraud, safety failures and outages need rapid signals. Nobody wants a quarterly smoke alarm. The same cadence makes no sense for pension allocation, brand building or recovery from a long illness. The period should be set by how quickly a sensible action can change, not by how often the database can refresh.

A campaign report changes three times before lunch. Each new version answers the previous hour’s random movement. By Friday, the team has created four incomparable tests and called the wreckage optimisation.

Sometimes a live number is reassurance or theatre. That is allowed. Calling every refresh decision support is the bullshit part.

At close of business the original plan remains available, now surrounded by a day’s worth of unnecessary fingerprints.

Behavioural principles

Behavioural ideas at play in this post

Short, plain-English explanations of the principles behind this post, with links to related books and examples in the archive.